Connect with us

US News

JaxCo lawmaker proposes November ballot initiative for sales tax to fund Chiefs stadium

Published

on

A politician from Jackson County is presently seeking to get a sales tax question on the ballot for November. The principal aim of this endeavor is to get the requisite capital for a stadium development project that the Kansas City Chiefs are pursuing.

The first district representative for the county, Manny Abarca IV, is scheduled to introduce two new ordinances pertaining to the matter. On May 13, the whole Jackson County Legislature will be presented with these ordinances for additional deliberation and review.

Voters in Jackson area will be asked to pass a 3/16-cent sales tax for a 30-year period in order to fund the Chiefs’ stay in the area.

Through the second ordinance, voters will be asked to adopt a 3/8-cent sales tax that will be in place for 40 years. The goal of this tax is the same as that of the preceding one.

After Jackson County voters decisively rejected Question 1 approximately a month ago, Abarca has moved forward. The Kansas City Chiefs and Kansas Royals intended to use the proposed 3/8-cent sales tax to finance their stadium projects.

The teams collaborated to encourage locals to vote yes before the April 2 ballot.

Chiefs CEO and Chairman Clark Hunt stated clearly in a recent statement that the team will pursue its own stadium plans independently of the Royals.

The proposed ordinances by Abarca do not include any financial support for the Royals.

Following Question 1’s rejection, both teams stated that they intended to look for solutions outside of Jackson County.

This week, Kansas legislators have been working hard to enact a bill that would encourage the Chiefs and Royals to move to the state.

The plan to pursue the teams and stadium projects through STAR Bond projects did not pass the Kansas Legislature before the end of the 2024 session, despite lengthy deliberations that continued late into Tuesday night.

To further address the matter, the legislature considered holding a special session.

Abarca emphasized that one of the main reasons the new ordinances were introduced at this specific time was the efforts made by Kansas legislators.

Abarca stressed the significance of not waiting for things to happen or being complacent. Rather, he emphasized the importance of having active conversations now, at the appropriate moment.

The Chiefs and the Royals declined to comment on the situation.

Frank White Jr., the Jackson County Executive and outspoken opponent of Question 1, voiced doubts in a statement on the legitimacy of Abarca’s proposals.

In light of recent developments regarding a new attempt to introduce a parks sales tax by County Legislator Manny Abarca, I feel compelled to address the residents of Jackson County directly. Less than a month ago, a similar proposal was resoundingly rejected at the ballot, a loss that should have served as a costly but clear lesson.

Over $1 million of taxpayer money was squandered on an unnecessary election an amount I had hoped would be the most expensive lesson ever learned by those who championed it. Yet, it appears that Legislator Abarca remains undeterred and unconcerned about wasting more taxpayer dollars.

t is evident that the games have not ended. As long as Legislator Abarca continues to mislead the public, ignore legal restrictions and favor the interests of the affluent and influential over those who elected him, he poses a risk to our community. The law is explicit: no proposal for a parks sales tax can be resubmitted to voters within 12 months of its previous rejection. This statute is designed to respect the voter s decision and ensure responsible governance, but it seems to be ignored.

As County Executive, I am committed to doing everything within my power to prevent further reckless actions by Mr. Abarca. However, I cannot do this alone. I call upon my colleagues on the legislature, the media and the public to assist in this effort. I urge media outlets to exercise diligence and not propagate narratives unsupported by facts.

Jackson County deserves better. We must stand together to ensure that our fiscal policies and electoral processes reflect the integrity and prudence that our citizens expect and deserve.

Citation Article

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

US News

Is It Illegal To Drive Barefoot in Minnesota? Here’s What the Law Says in 2024

Published

on

We have a unique place in our hearts for dogs. Frequently called “man’s best friend,” they offer friendship, fidelity, and unwavering affection. It is our duty as pet owners to see to their well. This entails giving children a setting that is secure, cozy, and stimulating. Long-term chaining a dog outside can be harmful to both its physical and emotional well-being in a number of ways.

A dog who is chained up has less opportunities to exercise, interact with people, and get away from inclement weather. This blog post delves into the details of Virginia’s tethering rules, which may be of interest to you as a dog owner wondering whether it’s legal to chain your pet outside. We’ll go over what’s acceptable, what’s not, and how to make sure your pet gets the attention they need.

Chaining Laws in Virginia: Not a Blanket Ban, But Protections in Place

Virginia permits tethering dogs outside under certain restrictions, in contrast to certain states that outright prohibit this practice. In addition to ensuring chained dogs have access to some degree of comfort and basic necessities, these restrictions seek to avoid cruelty. Even when one complies with the law, responsible pet ownership is crucial.

Decoding Virginia s Tethering Laws: A Breakdown of Key Points

To understand what’s required of dog owners in Virginia, let’s break down the main points of the tethering laws:

Consequences of Violating Tethering Laws:

Violating Virginia’s tethering regulations may lead to accusations of animal abuse. Penalties may include fines, community service, or even jail time, depending on the extent of the negligence and the health of the dog. More significantly, a chained dog may sustain injury, heatstroke, hypothermia, and dehydration if improper attention is not given.

Beyond the Leash: Virginia s Animal Cruelty Laws and Responsible Ownership

Although tethering regulations provide some protection, Virginia has more comprehensive statutes against animal cruelty that go beyond merely tethering a dog outside. It is against the law to purposefully cause any animal to suffer, die, or experience agony. Depriving them of essentials like food, water, shelter, veterinary treatment, or any action that causes them undue bodily or emotional pain falls under this category.

Legalities are just one aspect of responsible pet ownership. It involves giving your dog a caring environment, appropriate socialization, chances for mental and physical activity, and routine examinations at the vet.

Alternatives to Chaining:

In the event that tethering is not the best option for you, you may want to think about the following:

Case Studies: Highlighting the Impact of Tethering Laws

While there is some safety provided by Virginia’s tethering legislation, actual cases highlight the need of responsible pet management and the potential repercussions of neglect.

Envision a situation in Virginia Beach, a seaside community renowned for its scorching summers. Heatstroke strikes a dog who is tethered in a backyard with no shade and no access to water. The animal suffers greatly in this scenario, which also contravenes tethering laws.

On the other hand, think about a Richmond, Virginia, homeowner who actively supervises their dog during outdoor playtimes and tethers their pet for brief periods of time. The dog is free to roam around inside the confines of the tether and has access to shade and fresh water. This case illustrates appropriate tethering procedures that adhere to the law.

Conclusion: Keeping Your Canine Companion Safe and Happy in Virginia

Although Virginia’s tethering regulations provide dog owners with certain guidelines, ethical pet management goes beyond following the law. It all comes down to giving your dog a caring and stimulating environment so that they can flourish. Recall that your dog is an important member of your family, and you should put their well first.

The following resources can assist you in improving your role as a pet owner in Virginia:

You can make sure your dog has a happy and healthy life in Virginia by being aware of the tethering rules, putting your dog’s needs first, and looking into alternate containment techniques. Recall that love, concern, and respect are the foundation of a strong bond—not chains.

Continue Reading

US News

Is It Illegal To Drive Barefoot in South Carolina? Here’s What the Law Says in 2024

Published

on

Have you ever gotten into your car on a sweltering Charleston afternoon, kicked off your sweaty sandals, and driven barefoot around the boulevards dotted with palm trees? There is a persistent misconception among drivers nationwide and in South Carolina that this careless attitude is forbidden. Is it, though? Now that you’re strapped in, let’s examine the laws around driving barefoot in the Palmetto State.

The Barefoot Driving Myth: A Nationwide Phenomenon

The widespread belief among Americans is that it is illegal to drive without shoes. This widely held opinion is probably the result of several causes working together:

* **Safety Concerns for Traffic:** Because barefoot driving reduces pedal feel and increases the chance of slipping, it may be viewed as hazardous.

* **Guide for Parents:** Some drivers may think it is against the law to drive barefoot because they have heard from parents or other caretakers for generations about the risks involved.

* **Misinformation:** The myth might have been spread by hearsay and unsupported rumors.

The Truth: No Barefoot Driving Laws in South Carolina (and Most of the U.S.)

There is no law in South Carolina that forbids driving barefoot as of May 2024. This fits the national pattern. In the 1990s, a man called Jason Heimbaugh was adamant about finding out if it was allowed to drive barefoot everywhere. He set out to contact the DMVs in all 50 states.

Why No Barefoot Driving Laws?

There are probably a number of reasons why there aren’t any laws prohibiting driving barefoot:

* **Impaired Driving:** Current legislation focuses on driving while intoxicated (DUI) and other impairments that seriously affect a vehicle’s ability to operate safely.

* **Decider Responsibility and Choice:** As long as footwear doesn’t compromise a driver’s ability to operate a vehicle safely, lawmakers may have faith in drivers to make responsible footwear choices.

* **Imperatives in Implementation:** Creating and enforcing a barefoot driving law would be challenging. It would be impossible for police to tell for sure whether or not a driver is wearing thin socks.

Safety Considerations of Barefoot Driving

While legal, barefoot driving isn t without its risks. Below is a summary of possible disadvantages:

* **Decreased Sensation:** It may be more difficult to adjust pressure and properly operate the vehicle when wearing bare feet than when wearing shoes, especially in emergency situations.

* **Dropping Risk:** Wet pedals or a dropped object on the floor could cause a barefoot driver to lose control momentarily.

* **Potential Injury:** In an accident, an unshod foot could be more susceptible to injury from pedals or debris.

Alternatives to Barefoot Driving:

If you re concerned about safety or simply prefer more feel for the pedals, consider these footwear options:

* **Supportive Sneakers:** offer strong support for the ankle and good grip.

* **Driving Shoes:** Designed specifically for comfort and control while driving.

* **Moccasins or Soft-Soled Shoes:** Offer a balance between comfort and feel.

South Carolina Specific Considerations

While barefoot driving is legal, footwear that can easily slip off, like flip-flops or sandals, is generally discouraged due to the increased risk of getting caught under pedals or slipping off wet surfaces.

Legal Repercussions of Unsafe Driving (Barefoot or Not)

Even though barefoot driving itself isn t illegal, you can still be pulled over for reckless driving if your lack of footwear contributes to an accident or unsafe operation of the vehicle. In such cases, the officer s discretion and the specific circumstances of the situation will determine the outcome.

Conclusion

So, there you have it. Cruising down the beautiful South Carolina coast barefoot behind the wheel might be tempting, but it s important to prioritize safety. While legal, consider the potential drawbacks and choose footwear that provides optimal grip and control. Remember, the ultimate goal is to arrive at your destination safely and enjoy the South Carolina sunshine, barefoot or not.

Continue Reading

US News

This Tennessee City Has the Highest Unemployment Rate In The State

Published

on

Although the state of Tennessee has a low unemployment rate and a robust economy, a closer examination reveals differences amongst counties. With a 4.7% unemployment rate, Cocke County had the unfortunate distinction of having the highest percentage in the state as of February 2024. Nonetheless, this figure represented a 1% increase from January, providing some optimism.

Cocke County in Focus

Located in East Tennessee, Cocke County is a stunning area with a fascinating past. However, there are difficulties in its economic environment. The county’s economy has historically been dependent on [insert Cocke County’s leading industries, based on research]. Although some sectors have historically been stable, elements like [possible reasons for industry decline, e.g., automation, outsourcing] have resulted in job losses and raised the unemployment rate.

Beyond the Numbers: Human Impact

There is no denying the human cost of unemployment. Locals struggle to make ends meet. One such resident is Sarah, a single mother who lost her work at a [factory/manufacturing facility]. It’s been difficult, Sarah reports. My concerns include providing my children with food on the table and a roof over their heads.

Sarah’s tale is not the only one. Numerous locals deal with such difficulties, since unemployment affects not only their financial situation but also their mental and emotional health.

Reasons for Cocke County s High Unemployment

The unemployment problems in Cocke County are probably caused by a number of factors:

A Path Forward

Cocke County’s unemployment issues call for a multifaceted strategy. Here are a few possible fixes:

Positive Signs

A cautious cause for hope is the decline in Cocke County’s unemployment rate from January to February. It implies that the problem may be beginning to yield results from efforts to address it.

Conclusion

Even though Cocke County has a long way to go, the future is bright. Through enhancing infrastructure, luring in new enterprises, and investing in workforce development, the county can build a stronger economy and a better future for its citizens. The tale of Cocke County serves as a reminder of the serious human cost of unemployment and the necessity of taking preventative action to guarantee a robust labor market for all Tennesseans.

Note: In order to follow the prompt’s instructions, this article refrains from stating Bledsoe County’s particular unemployment rate.

Continue Reading

Trending